tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7110460687773644977.post9056412914773853541..comments2023-09-02T07:14:49.753-04:00Comments on Atheism And The City: William Lane Craig: Evolution Is Evidence For The Existence Of God!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7110460687773644977.post-5046996617834947192013-08-07T14:55:41.344-04:002013-08-07T14:55:41.344-04:00WLC seems to have never met a bad argument for God...WLC seems to have never met a bad argument for God - he seems willing to bring up any old rubbish.<br /><br />I find him a bit of an odd case, since he is obviously an intelligent man, and yet he basically hangs his entire worldview on a vague feeling he had as an teenager.Rianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08021810579773953296noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7110460687773644977.post-1974566602081172472013-08-01T13:44:46.281-04:002013-08-01T13:44:46.281-04:00I absolutely loath WLC. I'm at the point where...I absolutely loath WLC. I'm at the point where I can't even stand his voice for a few seconds and the only time I can bare to listen to him is when I critique his arguments. I'm slowly working my way towards destroying all of the arguments in his standard repertoire. The Thinkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14303015383137218932noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7110460687773644977.post-66960939299438047662013-08-01T10:40:20.554-04:002013-08-01T10:40:20.554-04:00Haha, I love these calculations. I've tried to...Haha, I love these calculations. I've tried to do something similar in the past, but your numbers really illustrate the point well.<br /><br />As to WLC, he drives me absolutely crazy. His arguments are terrible, and yet people cite him as if he has this magic bullet to prove Christianity true. It's maddening, especially when he talks about a topic I know well. I found a post on his website where he was arguing that an infinite past is impossible, it was very clear that he has no idea how infinities work. I had no choice but to <a href="http://hausdorffbb.blogspot.com/2013/01/william-lane-craig-doesnt-understand.html" rel="nofollow">write a post</a> destroying his argumentHausdorffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01690401058367596952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7110460687773644977.post-19152732359197615862013-08-01T06:25:59.570-04:002013-08-01T06:25:59.570-04:00I second your emotion about Craig. Feel free to us...I second your emotion about Craig. Feel free to use anything from my blog to argue against your brother if needed. Or if you just want to give me a hard time. I spend a lot of time refuting Craig's terrible arguments. The Thinkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14303015383137218932noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7110460687773644977.post-86941059755846445062013-08-01T04:25:22.632-04:002013-08-01T04:25:22.632-04:00I personally cannot stand William Lane Craig. His ...I personally cannot stand William Lane Craig. His arguments are terrible and do not suggest actual proof of the existence of god. Unfortunately, my brother is a huge fan of his and it sickens me. My brother tried using the cosmological, ontological, and moral arguments to persuade me to believe in God.<br /> He said "I thought I would share with you the reasons why I rationally came to the conclusion that God does exist and Christianity is true. The following are all logically air tight, sound arguments as i am sure you know with your experience in logic class. Since I am a rational person, my belief in God will remain until all of these arguments are shown to be wrong. Keep in mind that all of these arguments stand alone so even if one of them were to be proven wrong, which to this day, none have been proven wrong, then all of the other arguments still stand!" <br /><br />I literally face palmed. I have taken logic before (my brother has not) and I understand the actual implications of using logical arguments. What people fail to understand is that validity doesn't mean the argument is sound. I also rearranged all of Craig's arguments to validly show God doesn't exist. The logical arguments that Craig uses doesn't show the existence or denial of God. They are merely formal logic word games dealing with undetermined things. TheSkeptic https://www.blogger.com/profile/06208691220359975864noreply@blogger.com